Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Handling Surgical Specimens to Decrease Errors in Pathology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Perioperative Safety and Efficiency

  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

Errors in pathology are rare but may have disastrous consequences. They happen at any of the three stages of specimen handling: the pre-analytical stage before the specimen reaches the lab, the analytical stage when the specimen is in the lab with the pathologist for processing and interpretation, and the post-analytical stage when the result is officially reported. In this chapter, we will briefly go over the different steps a specimen goes through before reaching the lab, namely patient identification, communication between clinician and pathologist, clinical history, tissue identification and orientation, tissue preservation, and tissue transportation. We will also discuss the errors that can occur during this process and what can be done to minimize and prevent them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rao S, Masilamani S, Sundaram S, Prathiba D, Rajendiran S. Quality measures in pre-analytical phase of tissue processing: understanding its value in histopathology. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):EC7–EC11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rabinovitch A. The College of American Pathologists laboratory accreditation program. Accred Qual Assur. 2002;7(11):473–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Valenstein PN, Sirota RL. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine. Clin Lab Med. 2004;24(4):979–96, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Francis DL, Prabhakar S, Sanderson SO. A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen–labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(4):972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marberger M, McConnell JD, Fowler I, Andriole GL, Bostwick DG, Somerville MC, et al. Biopsy misidentification identified by DNA profiling in a large multicenter trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1744.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer E, Underwood RS, Padmanabhan V. Patient misidentification in Papanicolaou tests: a systems-based approach to reducing errors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(8):1297–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tapper MA, Pethick JC, Dilworth LL, McGrowder DA. Pre-analytical errors at the chemical pathology laboratory of a teaching hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):BC16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakhleh RE, Zarbo RJ. Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,004,115 cases from 417 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;120(3):227.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hawkins R. Managing the pre-and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. Ann Lab Med. 2012;32(1):5–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lott R, Tunnicliffe J, Sheppard E, Committee NSfHH. Pre-microscopic examination specimen handling guidelines in the surgical pathology laboratory. College of American Pathologists (CAP) and National Society for Histotechnology Published by HISTOQIP. 2014:1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lott R, Tunnicliffe J, Sheppard E, Santiago J, Hladik C, Nasim M, et al. Practical guide to specimen handling in surgical pathology. Northfield: College of American Pathologists (CAP); 2015. p. 24–52.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakhleh RE, Gephardt G, Zarbo RJ. Necessity of clinical information in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 771 475 surgical pathology cases from 341 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999;123(7):615–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakhleh RE, Zarbo RJ. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122(4):303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Troxel DB, Sabella JD. Problem areas in pathology practice. Uncovered by a review of malpractice claims. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18(8):821–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakhleh RE. Patient safety and error reduction in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(2):181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fraenkel-Conrat H, Olcott HS. The reaction of formaldehyde with proteins. V. Cross-linking between amino and primary amide or guanidyl groups. J Am Chem Soc. 1948;70(8):2673–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox CH, Johnson FB, Whiting J, Roller PP. Formaldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem. 1985;33(8):845–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;138(2):241–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(1):18–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Portier BP, Wang Z, Downs-Kelly E, Rowe JJ, Patil D, Lanigan C, et al. Delay to formalin fixation ‘cold ischemia time’: effect on ERBB2 detection by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Mod Pathol. 2013;26(1):1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yildiz-Aktas IZ, Dabbs DJ, Bhargava R. The effect of cold ischemic time on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(8):1098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rolls G. Fixation and fixatives (2)–factors influencing chemical fixation, formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde. Leica Biosystems; 2012. http://www.leicabiosystems.com/pathologyleaders/fixation-and-fixatives-2-factors-influencing-chemical-fixation-formaldehyde-and-glutaraldehyde.

  23. Fergenbaum JH, Garcia-Closas M, Hewitt SM, Lissowska J, Sakoda LC, Sherman ME. Loss of antigenicity in stored sections of breast cancer tissue microarrays. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(4):667–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khoury T, Sait S, Hwang H, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding G, Tan D, et al. Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers. Mod Pathol. 2009;22(11):1457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hewitt SM, Robinowitz M, Bogen SA, Gown AM, Kalra KL, Otis CN, et al. Quality assurance for design control and implementation of immunohistochemistry assays; approved guideline. 2nd ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bancroft JD, Gamble M. Theory and practice of histological techniques. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lott R. HQIP: H&E staining. HQIP—a final critique. Chicago: College of American Pathologists; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krishnan RP, Ramani P, Sherlin HJ, Sukumaran G, Ramasubramanian A, Jayaraj G, et al. Surgical specimen handover from operation theater to laboratory: a survey. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018;8(2):234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomson AM, Wallace WA. Fixation artefact in an intra-operative frozen section: a potential cause of misinterpretation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;2(1):45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Association of Surgical Technologists. AST standards of practice for handling and care of surgical specimens. http://www.ast.org/uploadedFiles/Main_Site/Content/About_Us/Standard_Handling_Care_Surgical_Specimens.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Fouad Boulos

  2. Department of Anatomical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

    Michel Attieh

Authors
  1. Fouad Boulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michel Attieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

    Jamal J Hoballah

  2. Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Haytham MA Kaafarani

  3. Transplantation Surgery, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Georgios Tsoulfas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boulos, F., Attieh, M. (2024). Handling Surgical Specimens to Decrease Errors in Pathology. In: Hoballah, J.J., Kaafarani, H.M., Tsoulfas, G. (eds) Principles of Perioperative Safety and Efficiency. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41089-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41089-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41088-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41089-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation